HILLPAC will morph

Senator and potential Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is 'double-dipping.' According to Newday.com's evaluation of Senator Clinton's FEC (Federal Election Commission) quarterly reports, the New York senator has been paying eight full-time Senate staffers (that's government workers who receive a paycheck from the U.S. Senate) to work overtime for her 2006 Senate campaign. The money is coming from Friends of Hillary—her Senate re-election committee—and HILLPAC—her leadership committee which has been charged with being nothing more than the caterpillar that will soon morph into a full-fledged Presidential campaign according to Human Events Online. There is certainly nothing illegal about what the Senator is doing. In fact, many senators participate in the practice. However, what is significant about Hillary's overtime workers is that there are eight of them and they are being paid by two political action committees. Generally, a senator will have one or two of their staffers moonlight for the campaign, but the fact that Hillary has eight burning the midnight oil suggests that something bigger is going on. For example, Tamera Luzzatto, Clinton's Washington chief-of-staff has her $135,000 Senate salary augmented at $1,700 a month by the two PACs (September totals).
HILLPAC is not an incredibly well-funded PAC, boasting only about $3,000 in the bank after donating some money to other politicians affiliated with the PAC and paying the senator's overtime workers. Friends of Hillary, however, reports a $14M war-chest. (FEC report)
I don't think there is anything unfair about what Hillary Clinton is doing here. It is perfectly legal to pay your Senate office workers extra money from your war-chest if they are doing political consulting on the side. According to the FEC, there is nothing wrong with it as long as you report where that money is coming from. The point is that while she is concerning herself with her Senate re-election campaign (which Friends of Hillary is dedicated to), she is also building a shell for her presidential bid in 2008 (HILLPAC). It is obvious that HILLPAC is not actually a committee dedicated to “[helping] candidates who support a cleaner environment, better schools, quality health care and a strong homeland defense” because it donates little money and provides no services to the politicians it supports. She is building an organization that will allow her to store her endorsements, political masterminds, and war-chest until the appropriate time arrives to apply them to the 2008 horserace. The fact is that Hillary, and Bill, are political geniuses—regardless of their politics. They know where the loopholes are, and they're going to need every loophole they can get if they want to defeat whatever political powerhouse the GOP puts up in 2008.
Editor's Note: I hope you all had a great Thanksgiving. The ECS is on the way.

5 Comments:
Hello Ben.
I was wondering what you thought about the idea that perhaps bringing up the idea of Bill when discussing Hillary's possible bid for president marginalizes her canidacy? Is running for president a team sport? Do you think Americans will be re-electing Bill if they (re)elect Hillary? What does this say about the underlying sexism of male dominated American politics?
I never knew staffers made so much money.
anonymous, regarding the "Billary" thing, 2004's puerile and stupid Deliver Us From Evil by Clark Kent Hannity devotes a whole chapter to this, explicitly to poop on Hillary's 2008 bid. The rest of the crew will join in soon with this point of attack.
So I guess the damage is caused as much by the RNC just forcefeeding this notion as it is by sexism. And you're regurgitating it.
My faithful readers,
I understand that billing Hillary and Bill as a team could have sexist implications, but you cannot deny the reality of the situation. For Hillary to deny campaign assistance/advice from Bill would be unproductive to her campaign. He has been a very successful politican (he's only lost two elections in his life time--one for the House and the other was his second gubernatorial bid; he was elected governor of Arkansas for a total of 14 years; 6 elections). And there is little doubt that at least some of Bill's old workers would find their way into a Hillary presidency just as some of Daddy Bush's lower-level administrators found their way in to Bush II's admin--Rumsfeld, Rove, and Powell (to a lesser extent). So, is billing them as a team prudent? I think it is the reality of the situation. Is it sexist? I don't think it is. It is no different than Bush II using the practical experience of his father to help in the election.
Futhermore, I think many people who follow Hillary know that she is an increadibly strong woman who not only knows how to assert her own power, but is not too proud to accept advise from a proven political mastermind that is so close to her.
Interesting question about how much Hillary is not "Clinton Light" but "Clinton w/out Sex/Lies Baggage." Everyone assumes that BC will be HC's unposted Consiglieri, but that she will not engage in his capers. Part of this comes from the popular belief that men are more virtuous than women. See polling data from this release below.
That said: Post-Bush, downspirited Republican will turn out to vote against ANY Clinton!
From: WRITE STUFF ENTERPRISES
Contact: Dan Klores Communications
Bruce Bobbins / Liz Anklow / Randi Peck / Gary Baronofsky 212-685-4300
RELEASE
WOMEN AND MEN FINALLY AGREE: ALL MEN ARE LIARS
FIRST NATIONAL SURVEY OF LYING HABITS FINDS THIS TO BE TRUTH
Post a Comment
<< Home