Jersey and Virginia speak volumes

Last night's off-year elections could prove to have presidential implications as Democrats maintained control of the governor's mansions in Virginia and New Jersey.
Virginia—Virginia Lt. Gov. Tim Kaine (D) won his gubernatorial race after defeating Republican Jerry Kilgore by more than 5%. Kaine's victory came despite a last hour appearance by President G.W. Bush in support of Kilgore. Kaine had the benefit of current Virgina Governor Mark Warner campaigning for him. Warner is an incredibly popular governor but is prohibited by state law from running for a second term. Some pundits are beginning to say that Kaine's victory could mean a spike in support for a 2008 Warner presidential bid. The Governor hasn't commented on the possibility, but many liberals seem excited about the prospect of a Democrat done-good from a Republican state.
New Jersey—Current Democratic Senator Jim Corzine won the Garden State's gubernatorial race last night after a bitter, costly campaign that included a personal attack on Corzine from his ex-wife in which she said that the Senator let his family down and would probably do the same to New Jersey. The fact that it was a heated campaign is not the issue here. What is important is that Corzine is giving up his seat in the U.S. Senate, a seat that cost him $60 million of his own fortune to obtain, to take over as Jersey's governor (the gubernatorial campaign cost him about $30 million). Some bloggers say that there is no possibility that Corzine will run in 2008 because he lacks the political machinery to do so.
The fact is that no senator has won a presidential election since Kennedy. And there doesn't seem to be any logical reason why a man of Corzine's background—CEO of Goldman Sachs and Co.—would not only opt for a less powerful position, but actually pay $30 million to give up a seat in the Senate for the governorship of New Jersey. Granted, as governor of New Jersey, he will appoint his replacement (who will probably report back to Corzine after every session). But the only obvious reason that Senator Corzine would make the move he did is because he believes it gives him a strategic advantage in a presidential race. Will it be 2008 or 2012? Maybe the fact that Corzine said, "I want to thank the people of New Jersey for rejecting the Bush-Rove tactics that we see in politics," in his victory speech speaks to speculation about showdown with the GOP.

1 Comments:
I'm just a layman, but I think you should take a look at Russ Feingold out of Wisconsin.
It's an easy conclusion to draw that the voting record is what kills most Senators' presidential bids. Right now Feingold's looks decent, or at least not as damning as Kerry's. Feingold was the only Senator who voted against the Patriot Act, and a steady critic of the Iraq war since it all started, in committees and in the full house. His record looks good to moderate conservatives too, having voted to confirm John Roberts.
Which brings up another thing: it's gonna be relatively hard to pin the "too liberal" button on him. He's not scaring anybody with Socialistic talk like Dean was with his free healthcare thing. (And NB Hillary's college days included tutelage by registered Commies).
He's definitely gaining ground with blogs buzzing and a gushing piece in a recent TNR. I like his chances to beat the Senate's dry spell.
But, he has been in Washington for a long time. Very soon the GOP and FOX will start disseminating bits of their their undoubtedly growing smear dossier on him.
Post a Comment
<< Home